bigpicturebigsound.com - The site for Home Theater and Movie Reviews
Forum | About Us | Contact Us | Shop With Us | Site Map | Search
Home
 
 Movies
 Reviews
 High Fives
 News
 Links
 Editorials
 
 Home Theater
 Ask The Expert
 Reviews
 How To
 News and Show Reports
 Links
 Deals
 
 Blu-ray Disc and DVD
 Blu-ray Disc Reviews
 DVD Reviews
Search
RSS
 
 Get Homepage Headlines
  Add to Google RSS feed Add to My Yahoo!
 Get Movie Reviews
  Add to Google RSS feed Add to My Yahoo!
 Get Home Theater Headlines
  Add to Google RSS feed Add to My Yahoo!
  
 Big Picture Big Sound Apple Widgets!
 Follow us on Twitter!
  
 

Movies : Reviews Published: 2009-07-14 - 13:53:34

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: Movie Review By Joe Lozito

Rating (out of four):

Welcome Back, Potter


Email this article
Printer friendly page
 

After an extended wait, everyone's favorite lightning-scarred boy wizard is back in "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince", the sixth installment in the projected eight-part adaptation of the seven-part book series. But the boy wizard is now a teen wizard and, as movie six suggests, he's quickly becoming a man.

In book/movie six, dark times are here indeed. Lord Voldemort's minions, the Death Eaters, are running wild, and the repercussions are felt even in the non-magical Muggle world. Wizened professor Dumbledore (Michael Gambon, pitch-perfect again) and young Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) try to piece together the key to Voldemort's power via a trail of human memories collected in small vials and viewed via a "Pensieve" (sort of a liquid VCR for the home movies in your head). It all leads up to a climactic event which, though common knowledge by now, I'd have to be a Dark Lord to divulge here.

As usual, screenwriter Steve Kloves (he scripted all but the last film) has done a masterful job whittling down J.K. Rowling's increasingly intricate story (even Peter Jackson must be in awe) into a two-plus hour film. Of all of the Potter movies, "Prince" takes perhaps the most liberties with the original material. The number of flashbacks to Voldemort's past is severely cut. The film wisely concentrates on the present day and the growing relationships between the characters - particularly the varied love interests for Harry and his old pal Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint, becoming visibly more comfortable in his supporting role). Hormones are running rampant at Hogwarts; even without the love potions, it seems the kids can't keep their hands off each other.

Of course, this is a summer blockbuster, so action set pieces are thrown in to balance all the talking. Aside from an opening Dementor attack on downtown London, there's a heart-stopping sequence in a water-logged cave which is as beautiful, frightening and fully-realized as anything in the series so far. There are also a few exciting trips to the Quidditch pitch which winkingly emphasize the phallic nature of boy wizards riding broomsticks.

The actors continue to grow nicely into (and with) their roles. Mr. Radcliffe still carries the film, and he's supported admirably by all the old regulars. The addition of Jim Broadbent, in a playfully brilliant performance as Potions Professor Horace Slughorn, keeps this film fresh and fun. Just watching his many facial twitches is worth the price of admission. Also, the fiendishly clever casting of Hero Fiennes-Tiffin as the young Dark Lord (his uncle's Ralph Fiennes, Voldemort himself) adds extra creepiness to the flashbacks. The young actor shows promise.

Ms. Rowling's genius was that her books matured along with her characters, and with her audience. In a surprising bit of Hollywood wisdom, the movies are following the same pattern. Each Potter film, rather than relying on a proven formula, takes risks, amping up the fantasy or the darkness as needed. With "Prince", returning director David Yates has created what might be the most mature Potter film yet. It's also the one that will be most inaccessible to non-Potter fans. Not surprisingly, the further along a franchise goes the more backstory the audience needs to know. Since there is less of a central mystery in this one (the "Half-Blood Prince" question is almost a D-plot), the film relies heavily on the audience's understanding of the many characters and their history. Working confidently from that assumption, the "Prince" story leisurely drifts through its paces. Mr. Yates wields his camera like a wand, letting it swoop through walls and over the Hogwarts grounds. When magic happens, it is without the fanfare of the previous films, though there are still some beautiful moments of CGI wizardry, particularly those Pensieve sequences.

Splitting the seventh Potter book into two movies reeks of desperate franchise-padding. But fans of the series know there's a lot of story left to tell. With Mr. Yates and Mr. Kloves signed on to do the adapting, this is one movie series I won't mind seeing extended. So far, it's movie magic.


Movie title
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Release year
2009
MPAA Rating
PG
Our rating
Summary
The sixth Harry Potter film is the most mature and fully-realized yet - which is great news for fans, but may hold little interest for the uninitiated.


Discuss this in the Forum

Last Updated: 2009-09-08 10:10:00
© 2005-2009 Big Picture Big Sound. No use or reprinting of content without permission.
Some movie photos courtesy of imdb.com
All ratings out of four stars | Privacy Statement | Online Shopping

Top of Page

FORUM
Discuss any of our articles, or just tell us what's on your mind in the Big Picture Big Sound Forum!
Latest Headlines
From Paris With Love
Frozen
Falling Awake
Dear John
Ajami
The Girl on the Train (La Fille Du RER)
Edge of Darkness
Saint John of Las Vegas
Off and Running
North Face (Nordwand)